This is my measurement of the low cost filtered LNA with SAW filter for 435 MHz. It got it from AliExpress (link).
I used 20dB + 10dB (=30 dB) attenuators and calibrated my NanoVNA for 380 MHz to 510 MHz.
As you can see below the LNA performance well. Gain is aprox 23 dB (exact acoording to specification) and the bandwidth is aprox 15 MHz (a little bit more then the specification of 10 MHz BW).
After my 80 meter HF loop antenna (SkyLoop) broke during high winds in 2025, aprox 30 meters of the loop antenna still is up and can be used as a random long wire antenna.
In Januari 2026 I connected an UNUN (DIY – maybe a 1:49, not sure…) to be able to tune the wire on all HF bands with my remote auto tuner RT-100.
I also added two counterpoise wires about 8 meters long to help reduce some common mode current on the coax and add better tuning possibility.
This is the NanoVNA SWR plot before the RT-100 tuner. The overall impedance is low so it should be better to use a different UNUN winding. But that will be some other time…
With an antenna RX splitter I did some fast compare between a simple RTL-SDR v3 SDR dongle and my IC-705 on 21 MHz and 14 MHz FT8. The RTL-SDR v3 is not original designed to run on HF, but with HF Quadrature mode it is possible to use it on HF.
And I was very surprised that this very cheap SDR could decode a lot of the stations that the far more expensive IC-705 did. The spectrum was cleaner from the IC-705 and more stations was decoded, but the results from the SDR was impressive because it is such a cheap and simple device.
PSKReporter map compare – 15 minutes RX on 14 MHz.
14 MHz
WSJT-X window. Cleaner spectrum from the IC-705.
WSJT-X screendump
Logbook from PSKReporter.
PSKReporter
Signals in dB from WSJT-X. The yellow reports are from the same station. I could notices some difference and RTL-SDR via SDR Console would often give higher dB values, but I have no idea why.